I just finished this video comparing which AI model is better in building a Monet clone image:
This is the first image generated by ChatGPT 5.1:

This one nails the sunny summer vibe with those bright colors, but it’s honestly way too orange and saturated to pass for a real Monet. The generic ‘ART’ and ‘CAFFE’ signs look kind of fake, like something you’d find on a jigsaw puzzle rather than in a museum. It’s a pretty picture, but it feels more like modern home decor than a 19th-century masterpiece.
This is the second image generated by Google Gemini Banana Pro:

This one is much closer to the real deal, capturing that classic hazy look and the specific blue shadows that Monet actually used. It falls apart a bit when you zoom in on the weird, gibberish text and the blurry faces, which are dead giveaways for AI. Still, if you squint, this one definitely wins for feeling the most like an actual historical painting.
The post ChatGPT 5.1 vs Gemini Banana Pro – Which Creates the Best Fake Monet? appeared first on Be on the Right Side of Change.
https://www.sickgaming.net/blog/2025/12/...ake-monet/

